<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Elliott, M.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sumampong, G.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Varga, A.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Shamoun, S. F.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">James, D.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Masri, S.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">N. J. Grünwald</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Phenotypic differences among three clonal lineages of Phytophthora ramorum</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Forest Pathology</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2011</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0329.2009.00627.x</style></url></web-urls></urls><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></number><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Blackwell Publishing Ltd</style></publisher><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">41</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">7–14</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;There are three major clonal lineages of &lt;em&gt;Phytophthora ramorum&lt;/em&gt; present in North America and Europe named NA1, NA2, and EU1. Twenty-three isolates representing all three lineages were evaluated for phenotype including (i) aggressiveness on detached &lt;em&gt;Rhododendron&lt;/em&gt; leaves and (ii) growth rate at minimum, optimum, and maximum temperatures. Closely related species &lt;em&gt;P. foliorum&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;P. hibernalis&lt;/em&gt; were included in phenotypic tests since these species are encountered in nursery surveys for &lt;em&gt;P. ramorum.&lt;/em&gt; Isolates from the NA2 and EU1 lineages were the most aggressive and isolates from the NA1 group were the least aggressive. The NA1 lineage of &lt;em&gt;P. ramorum&lt;/em&gt; was the most variable in aggressiveness and growth rate. The variability in the NA1 lineage was due to the presence of non-wild type (nwt) isolates. There was no significant difference in growth rate among NA1 wild type (wt), NA2, and EU1 lineages at any temperature tested. The difference between wt and nwt &lt;em&gt;P. ramorum&lt;/em&gt; isolates is discussed.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract></record></records></xml>